Arthropod anthropocenes: A call for action

International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

    • Arthropod Anthropocenes: A Call for Action" by Dr. Bonoukpoè M Sokame addresses the crucial ecological roles of arthropods and the threats they face in the Anthropocene, advocating for comprehensive conservation efforts.
    • The editorial highlights the impact of urbanization, agriculture, climate change, and pollution on arthropods, emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and habitat protection to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services.
    • It calls for a multidisciplinary approach involving enhanced research, sustainable agriculture, urban planning for biodiversity, climate action, public education, policy reforms, and international cooperation to mitigate human impacts on arthropods.
    • The piece frames the conservation of arthropods as a moral imperative, urging collective action to ensure the health of global ecosystems and maintain the intricate web of life that sustains our planet.



​​Abstract

The editorial "Arthropod Anthropocenes: A Call for Action" emphasizes the critical role arthropods play in maintaining ecological balance and biodiversity in the Anthropocene, an era defined by significant human impact on Earth's ecosystems. Highlighting the urgent need to address threats such as habitat destruction, climate change, and pollution, this piece advocates for sustainable practices to conserve arthropod populations. It calls for integrated efforts including enhanced research, sustainable agricultural practices, urban biodiversity enhancement, climate change mitigation, public education, policy and legislation reform, and international collaboration to safeguard arthropods and ensure the health of global ecosystems. This comprehensive approach underscores the indispensable role of arthropods in sustaining life on Earth, making a case for their conservation as a moral imperative for collective action.


In the Anthropocene, a period defined by pronounced human influence on the planet, the significance of arthropods in ecological systems cannot be overstated. These organisms, which include insects, arachnids, myriapods, and crustaceans, are crucial for pollination and decomposition, and serve as primary food sources within food webs. However, they are increasingly threatened by habitat destruction, climate change, pollution, and invasive species as a consequence of human activities (Cardoso et al., 2020; Dirzo et al., 2014). The decline in arthropod populations poses a direct threat to biodiversity, ecosystem functionality, and food security (Samways et al., 2020). "Arthropod Anthropocenes: A Call for Action" highlights the need for immediate measures to mitigate these impacts, emphasizing conservation and sustainable practices to safeguard these vital organisms and, by extension, the health of global ecosystems (Steffen et al., 2011; Wagner, 2020). Addressing this crisis is imperative for maintaining biodiversity and the ecological services arthropods provide, underscoring their indispensable role in sustaining life on Earth. This multifaceted crisis not only jeopardizes arthropod populations but also the broader ecological networks and services they support, thus, threatening food security, ecosystem health, and biodiversity, as presented in Fig. 1.


Figure 1


Figure 1

An illustration of the concept of 'Arthropod Anthropocenes,' showcasing the intricate interactions between human activities and arthropod life. It visually illustrates the effects of urbanization, agricultural expansion, climate change, and pollution on arthropod habitats and their adaptive responses to these human-induced environmental changes. Through detailed imagery, the graphic emphasizes the resilience of arthropods, their crucial role in evolving ecosystems, and the overarching impact of the Anthropocene on arthropod biodiversity.


The illustration (Fig. 1) provides a rich visual narrative that captures the multifaceted relationships between human activities and arthropod life within the current geological epoch known as the Anthropocene. This analysis draws upon existing literature to contextualize the topic, highlight the urgency of addressing the challenges faced by arthropods, underscore the role of interdisciplinary approaches in mitigating these impacts. We seek to unpack the myriad of themes and insights embedded in the artwork, exploring the intricate dynamics at play.

Urbanization and habitat transformation

Urban expansion and habitat fragmentation represent significant threats to arthropod diversity and population dynamics (Hallmann et al., 2017). At the forefront of 'Arthropod Anthropocenes (Fig.1), the depiction of urban expansion into natural habitats highlights one of the most pressing challenges faced by arthropod species: habitat loss and fragmentation. Buildings, roads, and other infrastructure carve through once-continuous landscapes, creating barriers and altering the conditions necessary for arthropod survival (McKinney, 2002). The adaptation of some arthropods to urban environments shows that some arthropods navigate the urban matrix, utilize green spaces, and exploit new resources (Fig. 1); however, it also reflects their resilience and potential for urban biodiversity conservation strategies (Baldock et al., 2015). This duality underscores the complex impact of urbanization, where it simultaneously threatens biodiversity and offers novel niches for adaptable species.

Agricultural practices and their dual role

The agricultural landscapes featured in the illustration reflect another significant human influence on arthropod populations (Fig. 1). While agriculture converts natural habitats into production areas, it also creates environments where certain arthropod species can thrive. The use of pesticides and the establishment of monocultures are depicted as threats to arthropod diversity. Goulson et al. (2015) discuss how modern farming practices contribute to declines in pollinators and other beneficial arthropods, underscoring the emphasis of the illustration on the dual impact of agriculture on arthropod populations. The push for sustainable agricultural practices, including Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and organic farming, mirrors the depicted transition toward methods that support arthropod conservation (Pretty, 2018).

Climate change: an overarching threat

Climate change is represented in the illustration through altered landscapes and shifting weather patterns (Fig. 1). These changes affect arthropod phenology, distribution, and interactions with other species. Parmesan (2006) noted that climate change affects phenology, distribution, and species interactions, with potential cascading effects on ecosystems. The visual narrative likely captures the cascading effects of these shifts, illustrating how changes in temperature and precipitation patterns can disrupt ecological networks. The resilience of arthropods to adapt to these changes is demonstrated, yet the illustration also conveys the limits of such adaptability in the face of rapid and profound climatic shifts (Fig. 1). This visual representation of these changes underscores the need for research and mitigation efforts focused on climate resilience in arthropod populations (Deutsch et al., 2008).

Pollution and environmental contamination

Pollution, a pervasive byproduct of human activity, is depicted through visual cues such as industrial emissions, agricultural runoff, and litter. Fig. 1 shows the impact of pollutants on arthropod health and their broader ecological implications. The bioaccumulation of pesticides and other chemicals can lead to declines in arthropod populations, affecting species that rely on them for food and disrupting ecological processes such as pollination and decomposition (Desneux et al., 2007). The illustration (Fig. 1) serves as a visual call for action to reduce pollution and adopt practices that minimize environmental harm.

Arthropods, resilience, and ecological significance

Despite the challenges depicted, Fig. 1 demonstrates the adaptability and ecological importance of arthropods. Despite facing myriad challenges, arthropods exhibit remarkable flexibility by exploiting new resources, playing key roles in pollination, and enhancing soil health, which are vital for ecosystem health and agricultural productivity (Klein et al., 2007; Lavelle et al., 2006). These activities underscore their indispensable contributions of arthropods to biodiversity and food webs, illustrating the complex interconnections between arthropods and other species. Furthermore, their ecological services extend to human well-being, providing essential functions such as natural pest control and waste decomposition, thereby supporting sustainable agricultural practices and environmental conservation (Costanza et al., 1997). This depiction not only highlights the inherent resilience of arthropods but also emphasizes to the importance of conserving these creatures to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and human livelihoods.

Human-Arthropod interactions, a spectrum

Fig. 1 adeptly encapsulates the diverse spectrum of human-arthropod interactions, spanning from adversarial to symbiotic relationships. It vividly portrays the dichotomy of arthropods, viewed simultaneously as agricultural pests and as indispensable allies for maintaining ecological and agricultural health. This duality reflects the critical discourse on the importance of adopting integrated pest management (IPM) strategies that emphasize the ecological roles of arthropods, promoting their conservation while mitigating their impacts as pests (Bale et al., 2008; Landis et al., 2000). This artwork serves as a poignant reminder of the complex interdependencies within ecosystems, urging a re-evaluation of arthropod management practices that safeguard their ecological contributions—ranging from pollination to soil aeration—thereby sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services (Tscharntke et al., 2005; Vanbergen et al., 2013). The visual narrative invites reflection on the need for balanced approaches to managing arthropod populations that recognize the multifaceted roles of arthropods and the imperative to preserve the integrity of our natural and agricultural landscapes.

The Anthropocene, a call to action

Ultimately, the illustration (Fig. 1) serves as a compelling visual commentary on the Anthropocene - an era defined by human influence on the planet. It underscores the critical necessity of adopting sustainable practices to comprehensively alleviate the adverse effects on arthropods and biodiversity comprehensively. This call for action echoes the literature, where Steffen et al. (2011) delineate boundaries of the Anthropocene and its implications for Earth's biota, urging immediate and cohesive global action toward sustainability. Furthermore, Cardoso et al. (2020) emphasize the essential roles arthropods play in ecosystem services, highlighting the dire consequences of their decline for global biodiversity and human well-being. The artwork encapsulates the dual themes of challenge and opportunity presented in the 'Arthropod Anthropocenes,' prompting a vital re-evaluation of our interactions with the natural environment. this approach champions the cause of conservation, advocating for strategies that foster adaptation and promote harmonious coexistence between humans and the natural world, as outlined by Dirzo et al. (2014), who call for comprehensive biodiversity conservation measures to ensure the stability and resilience of ecosystems in the Anthropocene.

Overall, the narrative of "Arthropod Anthropocenes" calls for a unified approach to confront the significant challenges arthropods face due to human impacts in the Anthropocene. The following points outline a comprehensive call for action aimed at safeguarding arthropods and, by extension, the health of global ecosystems:

  1. Enhanced Research and Monitoring : There is a pressing need for increased research into arthropod populations, their ecological roles, and the specific threats they face. Long-term monitoring programs, such as those advocated by Hallmann et al. (2017), who reported dramatic declines in flying insect biomass, are essential for understanding trends and informing conservation strategies.

  2. Sustainable Agricultural Practices : The adoption of sustainable agricultural practices that reduce reliance on chemical pesticides and fertilizers, as highlighted by Goulson et al. (2015), is crucial. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and organic farming techniques that support arthropod biodiversity should be promoted and financially supported by policy initiatives.

  3. Urban Biodiversity Enhancement : Urban planning should incorporate green spaces that support arthropod habitats. The creation of pollinator-friendly environments in urban and suburban areas, as suggested by Baldock et al. (2015), can play a significant role in conserving arthropod populations.

  4. Climate Change Mitigation : Efforts to mitigate climate change are vital for protecting arthropod habitats from extreme weather events and shifting climate zones. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting carbon sequestration practices will benefit arthropods along with other flora and fauna.

  5. Public Education and Engagement : Raising public awareness about the importance of arthropods and the challenges they face is fundamental. Educational programs and citizen science initiatives can foster a sense of stewardship and encourage participation in conservation efforts.

  6. Policy and Legislation : Governments should enact and enforce legislation that protects critical arthropod habitats from development and degradation. Conservation policies should be informed by the latest scientific research and include provisions for protected areas that safeguard biodiversity.

  7. International Collaboration : Given the global nature of biodiversity decline, international cooperation is essential. Agreements and partnerships that focus on habitat protection, sustainable development, and biodiversity conservation can amplify efforts and resources dedicated to arthropod conservation.

"Arthropod Anthropocenes: A Call for Action" is not merely a scientific or environmental issue; it is a moral imperative that demands a collective response from governments, industries, communities, and individuals. By protecting arthropods, we safeguard the intricate web of life that sustains our planet. This initiative represents a critical step toward achieving sustainable coexistence with the natural world, ensuring the resilience of ecosystems and the continuation of life as we know it. Through collaborative efforts, innovative solutions, and a commitment to ecological stewardship, we can alter the course of the Anthropocene, transforming it from an era of human-induced crisis to one of recovery and renewal for arthropods and the entire biosphere.
 
The editorial concludes by emphasizing a unified approach to confronting the significant challenges arthropods face due to human impacts in the Anthropocene. This calls for enhanced research and monitoring, sustainable agricultural practices, urban biodiversity enhancement, climate change mitigation, public education and engagement, policy and legislation, and international collaboration. This collective response is deemed not only a scientific or environmental necessity but also a moral imperative to protect the intricate web of life that sustains our planet, aiming for sustainable coexistence and ensuring the resilience of ecosystems for future generations.

References

Baldock KCR, Goddard MA, Hicks DM, Kunin WE, Mitschunas N, Osgathorpe LM, Potts SG, Robertson KM, Scott A V., Stone GN, et al. 2015. Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects. Urban Horticulture: Ecology, Landscape, and Agriculture 282: 20142849.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2849  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Bale JS, Van Lenteren JC, Bigler F. 2008. Biological control and sustainable food production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 761–776.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2182  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Cardoso P, Barton PS, Birkhofer K, Chichorro F, Deacon C, Fartmann T, Fukushima CS, Gaigher R, Habel JC, Hallmann CA, et al. 2020. Scientists’ warning to humanity on insect extinctions. Biological Conservation 242: 108426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108426  •  Google Scholar

Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R V., Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.
https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM. 2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 52: 81–106.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB, Sheldon KS, Ghalambor CK, Haak DC, Martin PR. 2008. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 6668–6672.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709472105  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, Ceballos G, Isaac NJB, Collen B. 2014. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345: 401–406.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251817  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botías C, Rotheray EL. 2015. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347: 1255957.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255957   •  PubMed   •  Google Scholar

Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E, Siepel H, Hofland N, Schwan H, Stenmans W, Müller A, Sumser H, Hörren T, et al. 2017. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12: e0185809.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809  •  PubMed   •  Google Scholar

Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274: 303–313.
https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frspb.2006.3721  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 175–201.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Lavelle P, Decaëns T, Aubert M, Barot S, Blouin M, Bureau F, Margerie P, Mora P, Rossi JP. 2006. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology 42: S3–S15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002  •  Google Scholar

McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: the impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. Bioscience 52: 883–890.
https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2
 •  Google Scholar

Parmesan C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 637–669.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100  •  Google Scholar

Pretty J. 2018. Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science 362: eaav0294.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0294  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar

Samways MJ, Barton PS, Birkhofer K, Chichorro F, Deacon C, Fartmann T, Fukushima CS, Gaigher R, Habel JC, Hallmann CA, et al. 2020. Solutions for humanity on how to conserve insects. Biological Conservation 242: 108427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108427  •  Google Scholar

Steffen W, Persson Å, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, Crumley C, Crutzen P, Folke C, Gordon L, et al. 2011. The anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40: 739–761.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x •  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8: 857–874.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x  •  Google Scholar

Vanbergen AJ, Garratt MP, Vanbergen AJ, Baude M, Biesmeijer JC, Britton NF, Brown MJF, Brown M, Bryden J, Budge GE, et al. 2013. Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 251–259.
https://doi.org/10.1890/120126  •   Google Scholar

Wagner DL. 2020. Insect declines in the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Entomology 65: 457–480.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025151  •   PubMed  •  Google Scholar


License

This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
1139 views

Published
February 15, 2024

Online First
February 15, 2024

Accepted
February 15, 2024

Reviewed
February 11, 2024

Received
February 11, 2024