Mission & Scope

The Nutritionist, presented by Sayans Publishers, LLP, is dedicated to advancing the science and practice of nutrition. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive platform for sharing and disseminating cutting-edge research, innovative methodologies, and practical insights in the field of nutrition and dietetics. We aim to bridge the gap between theoretical research and practical health applications, offering valuable resources for nutritionists, dietitians, healthcare professionals, and researchers. "The Nutritionist" is committed to enhancing understanding of nutritional science and its crucial role in promoting health and preventing disease. 

The Nutritionist encourages submissions of original research articles, systematic reviews, case studies, and opinion pieces. We welcome contributions from a global community of nutritionists, dietitians, food scientists, and healthcare professionals. Our journal aspires to be a key resource for evidence-based knowledge in nutrition, influencing practice, policy, and research in the field.

Editorial Board

Information for Authors

Thank you for considering Sayans Publishers, LLP, for publishing your research. Our Author Guide is designed to streamline the submission and publication process, ensuring a seamless experience for all authors. Please review these guidelines thoroughly before submitting your manuscript.

Ethics, Integrity & Conflict of Interest

• Ethical Guidelines: Research must comply with legal, regulatory, and ethical standards, including appropriate permissions and informed consent. Plagiarism and other forms of misconduct are prohibited.
• Research Integrity: Present findings honestly and transparently. Disclose potential conflicts of interest and credit all contributors fairly.
• Conflict of Interest: Clearly state any financial or personal relationships that could influence your research.

Corrections, Retractions, & Errata Policy

Authors must promptly inform the publisher of any errors in published manuscripts. Cooperation in issuing errata or retractions to address inaccuracies is essential.

Manuscript Types

• Research Articles: Original research findings across various disciplines.
• Reviews: Comprehensive analyses of existing research on specific topics.
• Opinion Pieces: Personal viewpoints on current debates in the field.
• Case Studies: Detailed examinations of specific instances within particular contexts.
• Serial Publications: Extended works on a common theme or project, published in multiple instalments.

Manuscript Formatting

• General Format: Use Microsoft Word or compatible software. Format with A4 paper size, one-inch margins, Times New Roman font, 11-point size, and double spacing.
• Title: Concise and informative, reflecting manuscript content without jargon or abbreviations.
• Authors List: Include all significant contributors, listing in order of contribution.
• Authors Affiliations: Clearly state current and study-related affiliations.
• Corresponding Authors: Indicate up to two, providing full contact details and ensuring responsiveness.

Author Contributions

Detail the specific contributions of each author, acknowledging all significant collaborators.

Highlights

Authors are encouraged to provide brief, engaging summaries of their main findings.

Study Limitations

Concisely outline research limitations in a dedicated sidebar, up to 350 words, to maintain transparency and integrity.

Abstract

Provide a concise summary (150-250 words) of your study, structured into Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusion sections.

Keywords

Include 5-7 relevant keywords, distinct from the title and abstract.

Introduction

Set the stage for your study with essential background information and a clear statement of the research problem.

Materials and Methods

Detail the study's design, materials, data collection, and analysis procedures, including ethical considerations.

Results

Present findings clearly and concisely, using visual aids as necessary.

Discussion

Interpret results in relation to existing literature, discussing significance and limitations.

Conclusion/Implications/Recommendations

Optional sections to summarize key findings and offer future research directions or practical applications.

References

Format references in Sayans Publishers Style, ensuring accuracy and consistency.

In-text Citations

Ensure all references cited in the text are included in the "References" section, and vice versa.

Tables & Figures

• Tables: Provide clear titles, consistent formatting, and appropriate data labeling.
• Figures: Ensure high resolution, proper labeling, and sequential numbering.

Supplementary Files

Include relevant supplementary materials in appropriate formats, clearly labeled and organized.

Check for a detailed guideline.

Information for Reviewers

Thank you for agreeing to serve as a reviewer for Sayans Publishers, LLP. Your expertise and insights are invaluable in maintaining the high standards of our academic publications. This document outlines the guidelines and expectations for our review process.

General Principles

• Confidentiality: Maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript. Do not discuss its content outside the review process.
• Objectivity: Provide objective and unbiased feedback. Personal criticism of the author(s) is inappropriate.
• Timeliness: Complete your review within the agreed timeframe. Prompt reviews contribute significantly to the editorial process.

Review Process

1. Initial Assessment:

   • Evaluate the manuscript’s relevance to the journal’s scope and its overall quality. If it does not meet the journal’s standards or scope, recommend rejection without further review.

2. In-depth Evaluation:

   • Assess the manuscript for originality, significance, and scientific rigor.
   • Critically evaluate the methodology, data analysis, and conclusions.
   • Check for clarity, structure, and relevance of the literature cited.
   • Ensure that ethical guidelines, including those for human and animal studies, are adhered to.

3. Constructive Feedback:

   • Provide clear, constructive, and courteous feedback to authors.
   • Suggest improvements and highlight strengths and weaknesses.
   • If recommending revisions, be specific about changes required.

4. Final Recommendation:

   • Clearly state your recommendation (accept, accept with minor/major revisions, or reject).
   • Justify your decision with specific comments.

Ethical Considerations

• Conflict of Interest: Declare any potential conflicts of interest to the editor.
• Plagiarism and Fraud: Alert the editor if you suspect plagiarism, data fabrication, or other ethical concerns.

Confidential Comments to the Editor

• Share any concerns that should not be disclosed to the author(s) in the confidential section of your review.

Review Report Format

• Summary: Start with a brief summary of the manuscript.
• Major Points: Discuss major strengths and weaknesses.
• Minor Points: List minor issues, such as typographical errors.
• Overall Evaluation: Conclude with an overall assessment.

Feedback on Revisions

If a manuscript you reviewed is revised and resubmitted:

• Review the revisions in the context of your initial critique.
• Assess whether the authors adequately addressed your concerns.

Reviewer Recognition

Sayans Publishers, LLP appreciates your contribution. We acknowledge the critical role of reviewers in the academic publishing process and strive to recognize your efforts.